56 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of substance use, addiction, child sexual abuse, child death, sexual assault, mental illness, child abuse, and illness.
This novel’s examination of the complex nature of guilt and forgiveness is complex and connected both to its interrogation of the justice system and its depiction of fraught family dynamics. Each of the characters wrestles with both guilt and forgiveness, but Angie, Nora, and Julian stand out for the way that their stories speak to the novel’s larger thematic project.
Angie is one of the novel’s most complex characters. Initially portrayed as a grieving mother struggling to forgive an incomprehensible act of violence, the narrative gradually reveals her as more morally complicated. At the beginning of the novel, it is evident that Nico was her favorite child and that she struggles to feel anything but anger for Nora. Although David, Martine, and even Julian feel compassion for Nora and worry that a juvenile detention facility is no place for such a young girl, Angie sees her as little more than a “criminal.” During one particularly heated conversation with David about Nora, she angrily tells him that “she’s not the victim” and that “no one has to be there for her” (29). At this point in the narrative, Angie has a black-and-white understanding of the difference between right and wrong. It isn’t until Angie’s past indiscretions are revealed that she begins to understand identity and personal choice in a more nuanced manner: Angie lied to both David and Julian about Nico’s true parentage. She deprived Julian of the right to have a relationship with his son and David the opportunity to choose whether he raised another man’s child. Angie realizes that, as Martine has been trying to explain to her, everyone can make bad choices, and no one is defined by the worst choices they have made. She realizes that everyone is deserving of forgiveness because no one is entirely without blame. Thus, she can forgive her daughter.
Nora is also a complex character whose motives are never fully explained. Martine and Julian theorize at the end of the novel that Nico’s diagnosis was devastating to her and that it exacerbated her already difficult experiences with mental health. Because Angie was so focused on Nico, she missed key warning signs that Nora’s condition had worsened severely. Because Nora loved her brother so much, she likely wanted to prevent him from experiencing the slow mental and physical decline of which he openly admitted he was terrified. Because so much of the family attention was on Nico, Nora had no one to talk to, and in her impaired state, might have thought that a mercy killing was what Nico would want. Julian and Martine look at Nora’s case and see tragedy. They see a girl deserving of a second chance and fair treatment in the judicial system. They approach all their cases this way, and Nora’s cellmates exemplify why Julian and Martine are so adamant that even violent juvenile offenders deserve rehabilitative rather than punitive treatment: One of Nora’s cellmates was coerced into selling drugs for her primary caregiver, and the other killed her sexually abusive father. Each of these girls made bad choices, but they were also subject to adverse, predatory forces beyond their control. Julian and Martine argue that girls like this do not belong in traditional prisons. “Forgiveness” in this novel means alternatives to juvenile incarceration, including therapy and rehabilitative measures.
Julian’s character arc speaks to both the novel’s interest in forgiveness as it relates to the justice system and individuals. He has spent the entirety of his career securing fair treatment for the kind of defendants that many in society write off. He approaches his cases with dignity and humanity and believes that no one should be defined by the worst parts of their identities. While his interest in removing bias and inequality from the justice system is rooted in part in his commitment to social and racial justice, it is also personal. Julian has never forgiven himself for Diana’s death. This has led to the misuse of alcohol throughout his life. It has also provided him with a heightened sense of empathy: Julian too knows what it is like to have made an irrevocable mistake. It is not until the end of the novel that he truly forgives himself for Diana’s death. Angie’s revelation allows him to understand that everyone is, at times, guilty. He was not the only one who made an error in judgment as a young person that had fatal consequences. He had been shouldering his guilt alone, but when he realizes that Angie too is guilty, he can finally forgive himself, move on, and prioritize healing.
The flawed nature of America’s juvenile justice system is one of this novel’s central focal points. Kristin Koval explores bias and dysfunction in the juvenile justice system through Nora’s treatment at the hands of a tough-on-crime DA and at the detention facility where she is incarcerated. Additionally, it explores this through its broader conversations about alternatives to traditional incarceration and both racial and class-based bias in the judiciary.
The DA’s approach to Nora’s case is entirely at odds with her age, lack of criminal history, and the questions that remain about the crime. He decides to try Nora as an adult, in large part because he is up for re-election and is running on a tough-on-crime platform. The ethics of his choice are meant to illustrate how many subjective factors are at play during the judicial process: Nora is a young offender with no criminal record and a history of mental health conditions. There are many mitigating factors in her case, and she does not seem like an appropriate candidate for harsh charges or sentencing. The DA’s decisions are rooted in self-interest and are thus morally suspect. The DA’s choice to charge Nora as an adult is also meant to ask questions about the ethics of that process, writ large: Nora and all of the girls with whom she is incarcerated (and all of Julian’s clients) were survivors of factors beyond their control; Koval argues through these characters that young people, even those guilty of violent crimes, do not deserve to have their entire lives taken from them as a result of mistakes that an adult might not have made. Both Angie and Julian were flawed teenagers who grew and changed into mature adults, and their trajectory is meant to cast doubt on the notion that childhood errors in judgment define who people become in adulthood. Lurking behind these conversations is also a 1990s-era crime bill that toughened incarceration standards and sentencing requirements, labeling some criminals “super-predators” to demonize them and rationalize their lengthy sentences. Julian understands that few people truly deserve this label and observes that many of his clients weren’t “exactly the kind of super-predator who should be kept off the streets” (137).
The detention center where Nora is housed also represents the dysfunction of the juvenile justice system. The girls are not issued warm enough clothing or given enough sanitary pads to last through their entire period. The food is not nutritious. The guards prey on them, sometimes through sexual assault. Nora’s cellmates both grew up in deeply dysfunctional families: One was selling methamphetamines for a family member, and the other killed her sexually abusive father. Due to these predatory circumstances, the narrative shows that neither girl was entirely responsible for her actions. The difficulty of their time behind bars and their harsh sentencing despite mitigating factors allows Koval to highlight the unfairness with which juveniles are treated in the United States justice system. Additionally, each of the girls is acutely aware that their race and class position impacts the way judges see and sentence them. They understand that Nora, as a white, middle-class girl, has access to better legal representation and will be given a lighter sentence.
Through the characters of Julian and Martine, Koval emphasizes that the US needs alternatives to juvenile incarceration that are rehabilitative. Harsh prison conditions, long sentences, and an absence of real, meaningful psychiatric help for juvenile offenders hurt both young people and society: Without access to rehabilitative measures, juveniles often fall victim to recidivism and become ill-prepared for life in society without the reflective tools to understand their behavior. Julian has spent the entirety of his career helping people who have been unfairly victimized by the justice system, and he has a special interest in juveniles like Nora. While he is happy that her sentence will be light, he understands that she likely would not have gotten the plea deal that she had had she been Black or brown.
The way that sensationalized media coverage shapes public opinion is another of this novel’s key themes. Koval explores the complexities of the modern media landscape through Martine’s work, Nora’s case, and the ease with which young individuals are tried and convicted in the court of public opinion.
Martine, although a dedicated attorney, has begun to sour on the profession because of the increasing media attention that the legal process garners. She took one case defending a young woman accused of abandoning her newborn baby in the trash, which became the source of sensationalized coverage. Because Martine is empathetic and understands the complexities of one’s experience and circumstances, she is shocked at what people say about her young client. She understands that the media shines a light on only a small fraction of the details of any case. Consequently, it upsets her that the public often turns on someone so quickly without having all the facts. She observes: “These days, once a person is accused, everyone rushes to judgement: guilty until proven innocent” (107). She believes in due process and doesn’t agree with the vitriol that people hurl at her clients. Even in cases where the accused are guilty of the crimes they are being tried for, she believes that people should treat them with dignity and humanity. She believes this because everyone can make terrible, split-second decisions, and most people have a few “skeletons” in their closets.
Nora’s case is similarly sensationalized. As soon as word spreads of the shooting, “Nora is the center of attention in Lodgepole. She’s all anyone talks about” (48). The public rushes to blame Nora for the seemingly senseless murder of her brother. They also blame David and Angie and even Martine and Julian for representing Nora. Nico’s illness and the possibility that Nora’s act was a misguided mercy killing are absent from the material that the media present to the public; so too are the Sheehans’ complex family dynamics and the possibility that Nora was experiencing significant mental illness challenges at the time of the shooting. The scene during which a woman on an airplane speaks to Julian about the case depicts this theme: She saw one, short Instagram clip about the case and has already decided that Nora is both guilty of the murder and a remorseless monster. This anecdote speaks to the sensationalism of modern media and the way that people consume contemporary media: Short, online clips are a more common source of news than long-form journalism, and the more clicks a story garners, the better the media outlet looks to its advertisers. Sensationalized stories earn more because they are more appealing to viewers.
At the end of the novel, Koval has explored each character in detail and revealed each a complex, multi-faceted mixture of good and bad qualities. Similarly, Koval has revealed the crime as nuanced without a clear motive or explanation. Thus, the broader argument at work is that crimes and criminal proceedings are ambiguous by nature and that the sensationalized media coverage available to most people is incapable of properly reflecting that nuance.
Unlock all 56 pages of this Study Guide
Plus, gain access to 9,150+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: